I am conducting a major research survey that will revolutionise the way we live for many generations to come. I need your honest opinions and views. What you say matters as long as it is honest; albeit somewhat personal in nature. Please don't be shy. Please take part in this survey and either answer in the comments box below or write to me privately at enquiries@holyvisions.co.uk
The more people who take part in the survey the better and more accurate our analytical data will be. No personal information will be kept on file. Just your anonymous response for statistical data and for further scientific developments.
You are all no doubt aware of the Chcolate Digestive Biscuit:
This is my favourite brand but no doubt there are many other brands available for your enjoyment, delectation, pleasure and delight.
What I need to know:
Do you eat the biscuit with the chocolate layer uppermost (like in the photo)?
Or with the chocolate layer under the biscuit?
Or does it not matter to you?
Give reasons for your choices. Does eating the biscuit with the chocolate underneath enhance the flavour as the chocolate layer touches your tongue and stimulates your taste buds? Or do you prefer the crumbliness of the biscuit tickling your tongue and awakening your desires?
This information is essential to identify peoples' preferences and tastes. Statistics show that people in Australia for instance prefer to have the chocolate layer underneath the biscuit. Whereas this does not seem to be the case, generally, (within a +/- 62% margin of error), in the Northern Hemisphere. In the UK for example, we have discovered that 79% of 17 respondents did not care a crumb which side the chocolate was on as long as you gave them the whole packet.
So there you have it. What is your preference of the three choices above? Please be honest in your replies as we may, depending on general views, develop a biscuit with chocolate coating on both sides, and another with no chocolate coating on it whatsoever.
Wait a minute ... the second version already exists.